February 25, 2019: The librarian in charge of the program escorted me
upstairs. From her description of the program, it generally followed the
LitLovers’ suggestions on the I Love Libraries site:
Ground
Rules:
·
Members who haven’t read the book. (LitLovers)
The moderator asked if anyone had not finished the book. A couple of
members had not, and two of us had read the book months ago.
·
Disagreements about the book. (LitLovers)
The moderator
welcomed and listened to everyone’s comments without judgement.
·
Dominating personalities. (LitLovers)
One man was vocal about
his dislike of the book and tended to ramble. However he allowed other members
to take their turns without interruption.
Book
Selection Process and Meeting Format
·
Don't read favorites. Do mix genres. Don't
choose for the whole year. (LitLovers)
The book club digressed from LitLovers’ guide in this
section. Although they choose books from different genres that are not members’
favorites, every November the group makes selections for the following year.
That session begins ½ hour earlier to allow for the selection process and the
book discussion. The meeting did not include a social time or discussion of
administration issues. The 90 minute discussion focused on the chosen book. The
member who has chosen that month’s book leads the discussion.
Experience
The discussion group consisted of ten people, including
me. Each person attending that night were regular participants. All but one man
from Rwanda and me were senior citizens from the local community. There were
three men and seven women. The club met upstairs in a boardroom. We sat around
an oval table and each of us had a place card with our name on it. On my visit, the selected
book was the young adult dystopian novel, Scythe, by Neal Shusterman.
Book
Summary (Source: Carmel Clay
Public Library online catalog)
Two
teens must learn the "art of killing" in the first in a chilling new
series from Neal Shusterman, author
of the New York Times bestselling Unwind dystology. A world with no hunger, no disease, no war, no misery:
humanity has conquered all those things, and has even conquered death. Now Scythes are the only ones who
can end life--and they are commanded to do
so, in order to keep the size of the population under control. Citra and Rowan
are chosen to apprentice to a scythe--a role that neither wants. These teens must master the "art"
of taking life, knowing that
the consequence of failure could mean losing their own (CCPL).
The woman who led the discussion was a retired middle
school English literature teacher. Her experience managing teens proved useful
during the lively meeting. She started by asking if anyone had strong feelings
about the book, its topic, or characters. Next she turned to the person to her
right and asked them to share their thoughts. The other participants responded
in succession. When the conversation came to one of the men, he condemned the
book as blasphemous and an affront to the Bible. Everyone listened politely
and voiced their opinions calmly. I did however notice some disapproving and
exasperated facial expressions among the members. One woman rolled her eyes when
he said the book was “pure evil.”
Probably the most interesting comments about the book
came from the man from Rwanda. He talked about the author’s choice of the word
“culling” to describe the act of killing as a means of population control. The
scythes perform a duty analogous to one in Rwanda, he said, where culling is
done to conserve African elephants and other animals. The man said that
elephants can be very destructive; they threaten their own ecosystems when they
uproot trees and trample plants in forests as they eat and roam. He also
referred to the genocide in Rwanda as a form of culling. His reflections
sparked questions about whether immortality in the scythe’s world is better
than life in the age of mortality:
When there is no disease and income is guaranteed, is the motivation to improve taken away? And if so, what is the value of life?
There still seems to be a built-in inequality because the scythes have power other people do not.
Is Shusterman creating a nihilistic society?
When the discussion ended, the moderator placed handouts
about the Scythe story arc on the table in case anyone was interested in
reading the series. I was surprised that she had not passed out the materials
at the beginning of our conversation. When everyone had left, the librarian and
the retired teacher explained that the man who was so opposed to the book
responded that way to any books they read. The women said that he only reads
nonfiction, and he frequently references the 1950s TV show, Leave It to Beaver,
as the standard of content appropriate for children and teens.
Evaluation
This was the first library book club I have attended. I
enjoyed the experience, even though the one man seemed determined to make the
conversation a platform for his religious beliefs. The moderator and other
members managed to keep the discussion’s focus on the book. Each participant
contributed interesting observations and stimulated conversation. Overall I
found the experience enjoyable and would like to attend another meeting with
the group in the future.
References
CCPL (Carmel Clay Public Library). (2019). Scythe: Summary. Carmel
Clay Public Library. Retrieved from https://www.carmel.lib.in.us/
Starting a Book Club. http://www.ilovelibraries.org/booklovers/bookclub/bookclub
Shusterman, N. (2016). Scythe.
New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
What an interesting read for a (mostly) senior adult reading group. I'm glad it was a book they chose to read and hopefully it will help in discussions they have with teens in their lives. You do wonder why the one man who constantly finds fault in the books continues to come and read the books. It seems like it might get tiresome for him to read books he does not like!
ReplyDeleteOne of the many joys of working with the general public! Haha It sounds like he has been coming to these meetings for a while now, so I'm just impressed with the librarian and the other members that they tolerate him in the way they do. I bet deep down, there is some part of him that enjoys the company in some fashion, otherwise, I agree, why would he keep coming back if he so vehemently opposes everything they read.
DeleteMy thoughts exactly! It was almost as though he was trying to keep us all on the straight and narrow.
ReplyDeleteRebecca,
ReplyDeleteIf you were in the position to lead this group, how would you handle the guy who continuously despises the books that are read, yet continues to read them and come to the meetings? Do YOU think there is a reason he does keep coming that would outweigh his dissent? Or do you think it would be more beneficial to the group if he was asked to not come if he continues to act this way? Is that even something that a librarian should be tasked with deciding? (I'm not sure how I would handle the situation if I were the leader in this scenario.... I'm not even sure there is a perfect answer!)
Hi,
DeleteI would follow the example set by my meeting's discussion leader. As long as he continues to calmly allow other members to have their say, he will be welcome. His participation may be irritating, but the club may be an important and rare source of company for him. The predictability of his reactions can also be a reliable stimulus for lively conversations!
Great observations and I loved that you tied it in with the Lit Lovers suggested guide! I'm glad you had a great experience and what a wonderful pick for a book! I'm sorry you had one "dissenter" but I agree with what you put in the comments. Something keeps drawing him back, maybe he really does love the sinful books! lol. Great job and full points!
ReplyDelete